fluent.com home page

     
 

Overview

 

The Fluent Benchmarks can be used to compare performance of different hardware platforms running the FLUENT flow solver. Due to large computational requirements of many of the application problems, a fixed number of iterations was used for the benchmark results. Care was taken to select an iteration interval representative of the overall performance of the flow simulation. For the parallel simulations, all grid partitionings were predefined.

Definitions
Descriptions
Disclaimer
Acknowledgements

Definitions

Rating- Rating is the primary metric used to report performance results of the Fluent Benchmarks. It is defined as the number of benchmarks that can be run on a given machine (in sequence) in a 24 hour period. It is computed by dividing the number of seconds in a day (86400 seconds) by the number of seconds required to run the benchmark. A higher rating means faster performance.

Speedup - Speedup is the ratio of wall-clock time required to complete a given calculation using a single processor to that of the equivalent calculation performed on a concurrent machine. Its value ranges from 0 to the number of processors used for the parallel run. When the speedup is equal to the number of processors used, the speedup is called perfect or linear. Sometimes the speedup will exceed the number of processors. This is referred to as super-linear speedup, and is often caused by the availability and use of larger amounts of "fast" memory (e.g. cache or local memory) compared to the single processor run.

Efficiency - Efficiency is the speedup normalized by the number of processors used, presented as a percentage. It indicates the overall utilization of the CPUs during a parallel calculation. An efficiency of 100% indicates that each CPU is completely occupied with computation during the course of a run, and corresponds to a linear speedup. An efficiency of 60% indicates that each CPU is performing useful computation only 60% of the time. The remaining time is spent waiting for other functions, such as parallel communication or work on other processors, to complete.

Redzone - The redzone is defined as the region of greater than 66% efficiency. It is arbitrarily selected as a region that it is favorable to perform a production run (to limit the amount of time a processor is idle while waiting, for example, for the communication phase of the calculation to complete).

Redzone Rating - The redzone rating is defined as the maximum rating achieved with a parallel run of a given benchmark and platform that occurs within the redzone.

Peak Rating - The peak rating is defined as the maximum rating achieved for a parallel run of a given benchmark and platform with any number of processors.

Serial Plots   Parallel Plots
Table results are listed below alphabetically by platform.

Descriptions

Class Benchmark Cells Mesh Models Solver Description
small FL5S1
32,000
hexahedral
ke
segregated implicit
turbulent flow in a bend
FL5S2
32,000
hexahedral
ke
coupled implicit
turbulent flow in a bend
FL5S3
89,856
hexahedral
ke
coupled implicit
flow in a compressor, rotor 37
medium FL5M1
155,188
tetrahedral
ke
6spe
react
DPM
P1
segregated implicit
coal combustion in a boiler, with particle tracking
FL5M2
242,782
hybrid, hanging-node
ke
segregated implicit
turbulent flow in an engine valveport
FL5M3
352,800
hexahedral
ke
6spe
react
segregated implicit
combustion in a high velocity burner
large FL5L1
847,746
hexahedral
ke
coupled explicit
transonic flow around a fighter
FL5L2
3,618,080
hybrid
RNG ke
segregated implicit
external aerodynamics around a car body
FL5L3
9,792,512
hexahedral
RSM
segregated implicit
turbulent flow in a transition duct

Disclaimer

Although care was taken to ensure that these benchmarks are representative of the performance of the FLUENT code on the hardware configurations submitted, it may be difficult to use these results to extrapolate the performance of a different simulation or of the same simulation on different hardware configurations. The results are based on data provided by Fluent's system vendor partners. The results have been carefully reviewed by Fluent, but Fluent makes no warranties about the accuracy of the data. Also, price-performance is not tracked in this benchmark. When considering the best hardware for your simulations, Fluent recommends that you contact your system vendors.

Acknowledgements

Fluent gratefully acknowledges the support and contributions of our system vendor partners to the Fluent Benchmarks.