fluent.com home page

   
 

RSM for Hydrocylones

 

By Mike Slack, Fluent Europe Ltd.

View the pdf of this article

The cyclone separator is perhaps the most widely used separation device found in industry. It contains no moving parts, and can be easily manufactured from a range of materials. Predicting the flow inside the cyclone is a challenging task, however. The correct choice of turbulence model is a critical factor in capturing the anisotropic turbulent features of this flow, which is further complicated by the high streamline curvature.

View Larger Image
Pathlines colored by residence time in the cyclone
View Larger Image
The air core that develops at the center of the hydrocyclone

The cyclone works by inducing spiral rotation in the primary phase (liquid or gas) and using this rotation to induce radial acceleration on a particulate suspension. In conventional cylindrical cyclone devices, there are two outlets, both on the axis of symmetry. The underflow outlet is situated at the apex of the cone at the base of the cyclone, and the overflow outlet is an inner tube (or socalled vortex finder) that descends from the top. The density of the suspended particulate phase is normally greater than that of the primary phase. Due to the imposed swirl, large particles migrate rapidly to the outer wall and then spiral down to the underflow. Smaller particles migrate more slowly, so are captured in an upward spiral near the center of the cyclone, and leave through the top. Running liquid cyclones (commonly known as hydrocyclones) operate with the top open to the atmosphere. Due to the low pressure on the cyclone axis, a back-flow of air can occur, forming an air core and increasing the complexity of the physics.

Most practical CFD modeling of hydrocyclones has been limited to cases without an air core and low volume loadings of the particulate phase. A single-phase flow calculation is normally done, and the Lagrangian particle tracking approach (DPM) is used to predict the separation efficiency. Since hydrocyclones commonly operate with air cores and slurry feed concentrations in excess of 10% by volume, simplified modeling approaches are not suitable. The air core shape is strongly coupled to the slurry concentration and swirl, and it governs the flow split between the outlets.

FLUENT 6.2 is the first commercially available CFD software to couple an Eulerian multiphase algorithm with a full Reynolds stress turbulence model. To demonstrate the potential of this new technology, a 75mm diameter hydrocyclone, open to the atmosphere and with a stable air core has been studied. The inlet feed is a limestone and water slurry. Six phases are used in the CFD model: a primary liquid (water), a gas phase that develops into an air core, and four granular phases with particles ranging from 10 to 40 microns. The nineteen Navier-Stokes and six Reynold stress equations were solved on a 70,000 cell model.

The results show that the finest particles experience a small radial force and therefore remain suspended in the water. These particles divide between the under- and overflow outlets in the same proportion as the water, as expected. In contrast, the larger 30 - 40 micron particles experience a greater radial force, so less of this material remains in suspension. Shortly after entering the cyclone, the large particles form an even layer on the cyclone walls. The layer gradually thickens as the particles approach the underflow, where most are removed.

View Larger Image
The predicted separation efficiency curve compared with measured cyclone performance for a 10.47% by weight slurry
View Larger Image
View Larger Image
Contours of volume fraction for smallest (10 microns, left) and largest (40 microns, right) particles show the size-dependent behavior of the limestone

The predicted separation efficiency follows the correct trend [1]. Considering the factors that can impact both the experimental measurement of slurry classification and the stability and sensitivity of this strongly swirling multiphase system, the results are very impressive for this type of analysis.

Reference:

1 T.C. Monredon, K.T. Hsieh and R.K. Rajamani, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 35, p. 65-83, 1990.


Previous Article FluentNEWS Next Article