fluent.com home page

   
 

Taking the Pressure Off in Outer Space

 

By Jerome Lacapere, Air Liquide DTA, Sassenage, France; and Bruno Vieille, CNES, Evry Cedex, France

View the pdf of this article

A few seconds before the lift-off of European Space Launchers, cryogenic tanks containing propellants are pressurized in order to have the necessary pressure conditions for the engine. If the Synchronized Sequence (a list of procedures to be performed before launch) is stopped (i.e. if the launch is aborted), the tanks must be returned to atmospheric pressure in order to control the temperatures and perform a new Synchronized Sequence later on. For future space launchers, this depressurization process will also occur during the long ballistic phase in microgravity conditions. In normal gravity, the pressure relief valve, positioned on the top of the tank, releases only gas to the environment, acting to lower the temperature of the liquid and ensuring the structural integrity of the vessel. In a microgravity environment, however, the liquid and gas phases will not separate by virtue of the gravitational body force, so it will be more difficult to deal with pressure relief by a release of gas alone. Since experimental measurements are not feasible in this regime, numerical methods are the most promising option for understanding the process. Experimental measurements of a normal gravity depressurization process performed at Air Liquide/DTA have been compared to simulations using FLUENT. Validation of this work has allowed engineers to put confidence in other depressurization simulations performed under microgravity conditions.

View Larger Image
The onset of boiling during depressurization of the cryostat in the experiment; the liquid level increases slightly before boiling begins
View Larger Image
Volume fraction of liquid nitrogen (red) and nitrogen gas (blue) during depressurization in normal gravity conditions
View Larger Image
Volume fraction of liquid nitrogen (red) and nitrogen gas (blue) during depressurization in microgravity conditions

Experiments were performed using liquid nitrogen in a glass cryostat, 800 cm in height. Pressure and temperature probes were positioned inside the vessel. Several rates of depressurization were examined for their impact on the thermal stratification and subsequent boiling patterns. For one rate studied, the level of liquid was found to increase slightly following depressurization, with bubbles observed to form, coalesce, and rise to the top of the liquid after 1.4 seconds, distorting the surface.

CFD simulations of this case were performed using the VOF model in FLUENT. Both surface tension and contact angle were specified, and source terms were added to simulate mass transfer during boiling1. Predictions of volume fraction showed that the results are qualitatively the same as those observed in the experiments. Both an increase in the liquid level and the onset of boiling were predicted. The CFD solution predicted more of an increase in the liquid level than that observed in the experiments, however. This is because in the 2D axisymmetric model, bubbles correspond to torii, so they take up more space than the spherical bubbles in the actual experiment, thereby forcing the liquid to rise more as a result of their presence.

After validation of this depressurization case, engineers have used CFD to explore depressurization in microgravity conditions. The same rate of depressurization has been studied, with g = 0.001 m/s3, and the results show a very different scenario. Bubbles form more rapidly, and the free surface is destabilized more easily. Rather than rise and coalesce, as in the normal gravity case, bubbles expand and entrain liquid throughout the entire domain. In one of the most significant findings of the study, the gas bubbles entrain droplets of liquid, and a mixture of gas and liquid, rather than pure gas, escapes out the pressure release valve at the top of the vessel.

Reference:

  1. S.W.J. Welch and J. Wilson, A Volume of Fluid-Based Method for Fluid Flows with Phase Change, J. Comput. Phys., 160, pp.662-682, 2000.

Previous Article FluentNEWS Next Article