fluent.com home page

   
 

NanoMist Suppresses Fire

 

By K.C. Adiga, NanoMist Systems LLC, Warner Robins, GA

View the pdf of this article

View Larger Image
Using the DPM, the entrainment of surrounding water mist into the firebase is shown by stochastic droplet trajectories

In the 1960s, Halon 1301 was hailed as an effective fire suppression chemical. Shortly thereafter, it was identified as an ozone-depleting environmental hazard, and a search for newer and safer fire suppression agents was renewed. The chemical HFC-227ea, a safer alternative to Halon 1301, is the most popular agent in use today. It has some limitations, however, because of by-products formed during its use. Water in some form would be an ideal permanent solution.

Throughout the years, the concept of using an ultra-fine water mist (with droplet diameters < 10 mm) for fire suppression has been generally ignored, based on the notion that such extremely small droplets would not have enough momentum to reach the fire, and would vaporize before contact. This notion is changing, however, as a patented ultra-fine water mist technology with the trade name NanoMist has recently attracted a great deal of attention. Using droplets less than 10 mm in diameter, the technology has demonstrated efficient fire suppression capability in various configurations. With the help of CFD and laboratory tests, scientists from NanoMist Systems have demonstrated that this ultra-fine mist may be a potential alternative to HFC-227ea for meeting both government and industrial fire protection needs, pending full-scale testing. The CFD results have yielded an improved understanding of how to generate, scale, and deliver fine mist clouds into a fire location, while addressing concerns about the premature loss of liquid droplets.

The new technology has some very attractive features, including 1) near self-entrainment of gas-like mist into the firebase; 2) considerably less water required compared to conventional water sprays; and 3) the relatively non-wetting nature of the mist on nearby surfaces because of fast vaporization. The amount of water required to put out a fire is far less compared to larger droplets because of the increased total surface area of the smaller droplets, the rapid increase in heat removal from the combustion zone, and the dilution of oxygen due to expansion as vaporization occurs. While the process technology required to produce such a fine mist and deliver it to the fire area on a commercial scale has been difficult to develop, FLUENT has helped make this aspect of the development and evaluation quick and affordable.

In the CFD study, a medium scale fire was generated using a volumetric heat generation source term. The discrete-phase model (DPM) was used to simulate the mist. Stochastic particle trajectories, influenced by turbulent fluctuations, were computed. The coupled solution predicted the rate of vaporization of water droplets subjected to the fire, and the subsequent cooling of the local gas field. The predicted centerline peak temperatures were used to judge the fire cooling capacity of the mist. CFD results vividly show the entrainment of water mist droplets into the firebase as seen from DPM droplet trajectories. The firebase pulls the mist from its surroundings. The behavior predicted by the CFD simulations was reproduced closely by tests of mist deployed to the base of heptane pool fires. These fires were put out in 10 seconds or less.

NanoMist Systems is now collaborating with the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) and Hughes Associates, Inc. (HAI) in evaluating NanoMist fire suppression technology for electronics applications. Preliminary results are very promising.

View Larger Image

 

View Larger Image

 

View Larger Image
NanoMist local flooding experiments show the entrainment of surrounding mist into the firebase, extinguishing the heptane pool fire

Previous Article FluentNEWS Next Article